Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. JEF scored 72.0, ETOR scored 83.0 — ETOR leads.
Compare another set
JEF
Jefferies Financial Group Inc.
Capital Markets · Financial strength
68.2Fin
$44.86 · $10.3B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
1.4
JEF leads
ETOR
eToro Group Ltd.
Capital Markets · Financial strength
66.8Fin
$24.86 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestETOR9.2x
Fastest growthETOR+9.4%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
JEF
ETOR
+2.9%C
Rev
+9.4%B
12.0xB
P/E
9.2xA-
8.6%C+
ROE
19.5%B+
0.87A-
P/B
1.50B
3.6%B+
Yield
0.0%C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
JEFJefferies Financial Group Inc.
Capital Markets · $44.86 · beta 1.54
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $10.3b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $66.60 — deep drawdown territory. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $55.67 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
D/E 3.82 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.54 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
ETOReToro Group Ltd.
Capital Markets · $24.86
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $2.0b. Down 44% from 52-week high of $44.21 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.38 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $45.80 (implying +84% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Down 44% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 2.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. Regulatory capital risk — stricter capital requirements (CCAR, Basel) can force a dividend cut or a capital raise; the largest banks are most exposed because they're held to the tightest standards.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is ETOR or JEF the better stock?
ETOR scores higher: ETOR 83.0, JEF 72.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are ETOR and JEF scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.