COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
JD vs RVLV
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. JD scored 56.6, RVLV scored 65.9 — RVLV leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. RVLV's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but JD's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
JD
JD.com, Inc.
56.6
$29.20 · $39.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
9.3
RVLV leads
RVLV
Revolve Group, Inc.
65.9
$23.96 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestJD19.5x
- Fastest growthJD+13.0%
- Strongest balance sheetRVLV0.06
- Highest qualityRVLV61 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueJD-52%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
JD
stronger →← stronger
RVLV
51
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
61
81
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
80
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
JD is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
JD
RVLV
$3.5bB
FCF
$28mC-
+13.0%B+
Rev
+10.8%B
0.37A-
D/E
0.06A
19.5xB
P/E
23.3xB
0.68A-
PEG
1.08B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
JD
RVLV
52% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
299% above
~-4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~55%/yr
+59%
1-yr DCF upside
-81%
+110%
5-yr DCF upside
-75%
+213%
10-yr DCF upside
-64%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
JD
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Foreign reporter (CNY)
RVLV
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
JDJD.com, Inc.
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $39.4b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $36.86 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.68 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 35 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $39.73 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 160% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 1.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
RVLVRevolve Group, Inc.
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $1.7b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $31.68 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $30.85 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Beta 1.64 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where JD and RVLV diverge
On the headline score the gap is 9.3 points in favor of RVLV. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueJD 80.5 · RVLV 61.7JD +18.8
- QualityJD 50.8 · RVLV 61.4RVLV +10.6
- GrowthJD 80.7 · RVLV 75.6JD +5.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.