COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
CELH vs JBS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CELH scored 72.9, JBS scored 66.6 — CELH leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CELH's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but JBS's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
72.9
$27.62 · $7.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.3
CELH leads
JBS
JBS N.V.
66.6
$13.12 · $14.1B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CELH
stronger →← stronger
JBS
64
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
100
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
69
61
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
JBS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CELH
JBS
$463mC
FCF
$833mC+
+82.9%A
Rev
+11.7%B
0.23A-
D/E
2.83D
120.1xD
P/E
12.1xA-
0.29A
PEG
1.04B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CELH
JBS
34% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
11% below
~2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
+22%
1-yr DCF upside
-3%
+52%
5-yr DCF upside
+13%
+110%
10-yr DCF upside
+40%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CELH
No notable signals flagged.
JBS
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · market cap $7.0b. Down 59% from 52-week high of $66.74 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +83% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.29 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $41.55 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 120.1x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 59% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 4.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
JBSJBS N.V.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $14.1b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $18.65 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $17.98 (implying +37% upside).
Moat
ROE 23% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
D/E 2.83 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Dividend payout 93% of earnings on a 10.0% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 2.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CELH and JBS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.3 points in favour of CELH. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCELH 100.0 · JBS 69.0CELH +31.0
- QualityCELH 63.7 · JBS 69.3JBS +5.6
- ValueCELH 60.7 · JBS 61.9level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.