COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
JBL vs OLED
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. JBL scored 65.5, OLED scored 67.9 — OLED leads.
Compare another set
JBL
Jabil Inc.
65.5
$318.39 · $33.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.4
OLED leads
OLED
Universal Display Corporation
67.9
$79.78 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
JBL
stronger →← stronger
OLED
72
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
72
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
OLED is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
JBL
OLED
$1.3bC+
FCF
$220mC
+17.8%B+
Rev
-8.3%D
2.97D
D/E
0.01A
39.8xB
P/E
19.3xA-
0.82B+
PEG
1.00B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
JBL
OLED
36% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
27% above
~23%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~16%/yr
-44%
1-yr DCF upside
-32%
-26%
5-yr DCF upside
-21%
+8%
10-yr DCF upside
-4%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
JBL
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
OLED
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Revenue shrinking
The companies
JBLJabil Inc.
Why now
Electronic Components · market cap $33.4b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $428.93 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.82 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $441.44 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
ROE 65% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 152% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.97 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trailing P/E 40x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 2.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
OLEDUniversal Display Corporation
Why now
Electronic Components · market cap $3.7b. Down 48% from 52-week high of $153.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -8% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $115.37 (implying +45% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Revenue contracting -8% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 48% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.56 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.