COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
HAFN vs JBHT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HAFN scored 72.0, JBHT scored 48.2 — HAFN leads.
Compare another set
HAFN
Hafnia Limited
72
$7.77 · $3.9B
Score gap
23.8
HAFN leads
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
48.2
$263.39 · $24.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestHAFN8.6x
- Fastest growthHAFN+7.4%
- Strongest balance sheetJBHT0.38
- Highest qualityHAFN94 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueHAFN-68%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
HAFN
stronger →← stronger
JBHT
94
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
43
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
64
96
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
24
HAFN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HAFN
JBHT
$981mC+
FCF
$1.1bC+
+7.4%B
Rev
+5.3%C+
0.40B+
D/E
0.38B+
8.6xA
P/E
37.4xC+
—
PEG
2.44C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
HAFN
JBHT
68% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
19% above
decline
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~19%/yr
+243%
1-yr DCF upside
-36%
+208%
5-yr DCF upside
-16%
+166%
10-yr DCF upside
+23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
HAFN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Short track record
JBHT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
HAFNHafnia Limited
Why now
Marine Shipping · market cap $3.9b. 19% off the 52-week high of $9.54.
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 34% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
JBHTJ.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $24.7b. 12% off the 52-week high of $299.76. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $305.45 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 163% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where HAFN and JBHT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 23.8 points in favor of HAFN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueHAFN 96.5 · JBHT 23.7HAFN +72.8
- GrowthHAFN 43.1 · JBHT 63.8JBHT +20.7
- QualityHAFN 93.8 · JBHT 74.3HAFN +19.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.