COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026

FDX vs JBHT

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FDX scored 61.4, JBHT scored 48.2 — FDX leads.
Compare another set
FDX
FedEx Corporation
Integrated Freight & Logistics · Quality-Growth
61.4
$331.41 · $78.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.2
FDX leads
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · Quality-Growth
48.2
$263.39 · $24.7B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestFDX17.9x
  • Fastest growthFDX+7.7%
  • Strongest balance sheetJBHT0.38
  • Highest qualityJBHT74 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueFDX-2%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD61.4/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY55.9GROWTH61.4VALUE67.3
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD48.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY74.3GROWTH63.8VALUE23.7
FDXJBHTQuality55.974.3Growth61.463.8Value67.323.7
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-5%18%13x42xFDXJBHT

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFFDX$5.1bJBHT$1.1b
RevFDX+7.7%JBHT+5.3%
D/EFDX1.36JBHT0.38
P/EFDX17.9xJBHT37.4x
PEGFDX1.41JBHT2.44
FDX
stronger →← stronger
JBHT
56
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
61
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
64
67
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
24
JBHT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
FDX
JBHT
$5.1bB+
FCF
$1.1bC+
+7.7%B
Rev
+5.3%C+
1.36C
D/E
0.38B+
17.9xA-
P/E
37.4xC+
1.41B
PEG
2.44C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
FDX
JBHT
2% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
19% above
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~19%/yr
-14%
1-yr DCF upside
-36%
+2%
5-yr DCF upside
-16%
+32%
10-yr DCF upside
+23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
FDX
No notable signals flagged.
JBHT
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Durable high returns
FDXFedEx Corporation
Integrated Freight & Logistics · $331.41 · beta 1.36
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $78.4b. 4% off the 52-week high of $345.37. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $356.37 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $78.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
JBHTJ.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · $263.39 · beta 1.30
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $24.7b. 12% off the 52-week high of $299.76. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $305.45 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 163% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where FDX and JBHT diverge

On the headline score the gap is 13.2 points in favor of FDX. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.