COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
CPA vs JBHT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CPA scored 67.1, JBHT scored 48.2 — CPA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. JBHT's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but CPA's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CPA
Copa Holdings, S.A.
67.1
$131.28 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.9
CPA leads
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
48.2
$263.39 · $24.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCPA8.6x
- Fastest growthJBHT+5.3%
- Strongest balance sheetJBHT0.38
- Highest qualityCPA78 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCPA-12%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CPA
stronger →← stronger
JBHT
78
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
64
78
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
24
CPA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CPA
JBHT
$335mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+5.0%C+
Rev
+5.3%C+
0.89C+
D/E
0.38B+
8.6xA
P/E
37.4xC+
0.94B+
PEG
2.44C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CPA
JBHT
12% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
19% above
~7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~19%/yr
-5%
1-yr DCF upside
-36%
+14%
5-yr DCF upside
-16%
+47%
10-yr DCF upside
+23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CPA
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
JBHT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
CPACopa Holdings, S.A.
Why now
Airlines · market cap $5.9b. 18% off the 52-week high of $160.47. PEG 0.94 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $177.73 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
JBHTJ.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $24.7b. 12% off the 52-week high of $299.76. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $305.45 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 163% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CPA and JBHT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 18.9 points in favor of CPA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueCPA 77.7 · JBHT 23.7CPA +54.0
- GrowthCPA 50.0 · JBHT 63.8JBHT +13.8
- QualityCPA 77.7 · JBHT 74.3CPA +3.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.