COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AUPH vs JAZZ
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AUPH scored 72.6, JAZZ scored 68.8 — AUPH leads.
Compare another set
AUPH
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
72.6
$16.65 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.8
AUPH leads
JAZZ
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc
68.8
$254.28 · $16.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAUPH7.3x
- Fastest growthAUPH+20.4%
- Strongest balance sheetAUPH0.10
- Highest qualityAUPH74 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueJAZZ-29%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AUPH
stronger →← stronger
JAZZ
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
60
60
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
88
86
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
AUPH is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AUPH
JAZZ
$175mC
FCF
$1.6bC+
+20.4%A-
Rev
+12.6%B+
0.10B+
D/E
0.92C
7.3xA
P/E
17.4xA-
0.58A-
PEG
0.96B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AUPH
JAZZ
9% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
29% below
~6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-5%/yr
-3%
1-yr DCF upside
+42%
+10%
5-yr DCF upside
+41%
+30%
10-yr DCF upside
+41%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AUPH
Why this score
- Earnings outpace cash
JAZZ
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
AUPHAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Why now
Biotechnology · market cap $2.2b. 14% off the 52-week high of $19.25. Revenue growing +20%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.58 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $18.17 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
ROE 51% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Pharma moat is patent runway + pipeline depth — a single approved molecule funds the next generation of bets. Late-stage trials carry binary readouts that swing valuation 30%+.
Risk
Beta 1.40 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
JAZZJazz Pharmaceuticals plc
Why now
Biotechnology · market cap $16.5b. 4% off the 52-week high of $265.05. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $281.35 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AUPH and JAZZ diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.8 points in favor of AUPH. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthAUPH 60.3 · JAZZ 87.6JAZZ +27.3
- ValueAUPH 85.7 · JAZZ 62.0AUPH +23.7
- QualityAUPH 74.0 · JAZZ 60.0AUPH +14.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.