Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. JAZZ scored 73.9, ADMA scored 77.0 — ADMA leads.
Compare another set
JAZZ
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc
Biotechnology · Quality-Growth
73.9
$216.75 · $14.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.1
ADMA leads
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
Biotechnology · Quality-Growth
77
$10.18 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestADMA14.5x
Fastest growthJAZZ+12.6%
Strongest balance sheetADMA0.50
Highest qualityADMA87 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueJAZZ-51%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
JAZZ
stronger →← stronger
ADMA
58
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
87
88
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
79
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
JAZZ is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
JAZZ
ADMA
$1.6bC+
FCF
$116mC
+12.6%B+
Rev
+8.0%B
0.92C
D/E
0.50B
14.9xA-
P/E
14.5xA-
0.96B+
PEG
0.79A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
JAZZ
ADMA
51% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
27% below
~-9%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
+82%
1-yr DCF upside
+14%
+104%
5-yr DCF upside
+37%
+139%
10-yr DCF upside
+82%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
JAZZ
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
ADMA
Why this score
Buying back stock
Durable high returns
Earnings outpace cash
The companies
JAZZJazz Pharmaceuticals plc
Biotechnology · $216.75 · beta 0.37
Why now
Biotechnology · market cap $14.1b. 19% off the 52-week high of $266.38. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $294.64 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 20% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
ADMAADMA Biologics, Inc.
Biotechnology · $10.18 · beta 0.69
Why now
Biotechnology · market cap $2.3b. Down 50% from 52-week high of $20.46 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $17.00 (implying +67% upside).
Moat
Net margin 33% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 41% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Pharma moat is patent runway + pipeline depth — a single approved molecule funds the next generation of bets. Late-stage trials carry binary readouts that swing valuation 30%+.
Risk
Down 50% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where JAZZ and ADMA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.1 points in favor of ADMA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
QualityJAZZ 58.5 · ADMA 87.1ADMA +28.6
GrowthJAZZ 87.6 · ADMA 75.1JAZZ +12.5
ValueJAZZ 78.7 · ADMA 69.7JAZZ +9.0
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is ADMA or JAZZ the better stock?
ADMA scores higher: ADMA 77.0, JAZZ 73.9 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do ADMA and JAZZ differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where ADMA leads by 29 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are ADMA and JAZZ scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.