COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

FTV vs ITRI

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FTV scored 58.0, ITRI scored 58.5 — ITRI leads.
Compare another set
FTV
Fortive Corporation
Scientific & Technical Instruments · Quality-Growth
58
$60.41 · $18.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.5
ITRI leads
ITRI
Itron, Inc.
Scientific & Technical Instruments · Quality-Growth
58.5
$99.34 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestITRI16.6x
  • Fastest growthFTV+3.6%
  • Strongest balance sheetFTV0.59
  • Highest qualityITRI65 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueITRI-11%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD58.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY62.5GROWTH56.1VALUE55.6
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD58.5/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY65.0GROWTH38.9VALUE79.1
FTVITRIQuality62.565.0Growth56.138.9Value55.679.1
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-16%14%12x37xFTVITRI

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFFTV$966mITRI$385m
RevFTV+3.6%ITRI-5.7%
D/EFTV0.59ITRI0.98
P/EFTV32.0xITRI16.6x
PEGFTV0.98ITRI0.85
FTV
stronger →← stronger
ITRI
63
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
56
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
39
56
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
79
ITRI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
FTV
ITRI
$966mC+
FCF
$385mC
+3.6%C+
Rev
-5.7%D
0.59C+
D/E
0.98C
32.0xB
P/E
16.6xA-
0.98B+
PEG
0.85B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
FTV
ITRI
13% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
11% below
~9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~2%/yr
-17%
1-yr DCF upside
+7%
-12%
5-yr DCF upside
+12%
-4%
10-yr DCF upside
+20%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
FTV
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
ITRI
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
FTVFortive Corporation
Scientific & Technical Instruments · $60.41 · beta 0.98
Why now
Scientific & Technical Instruments · market cap $18.2b. 6% off the 52-week high of $64.56. PEG 0.98 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $64.31 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 194% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 32x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
ITRIItron, Inc.
Scientific & Technical Instruments · $99.34 · beta 1.33
Why now
Scientific & Technical Instruments · market cap $4.3b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $142.00 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -6% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. PEG 0.85 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $129.60 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 141% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Revenue contracting -6% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where FTV and ITRI diverge

On the headline score the gap is 0.5 points in favor of ITRI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.