COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
INOD vs IT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. INOD scored 79.8, IT scored 68.3 — INOD leads.
Compare another set
INOD
Innodata Inc.
79.8
$64.21 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.5
INOD leads
IT
Gartner, Inc.
68.3
$195.90 · $12.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestIT17.6x
- Fastest growthINOD+39.0%
- Highest qualityINOD86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueIT-52%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
INOD
stronger →← stronger
IT
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
97
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
49
61
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
86
INOD is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
INOD
IT
$184mC
FCF
$1.3bC+
+39.0%A
Rev
+0.7%C
0.02A-
D/E
—
49.8xC+
P/E
17.6xA-
0.87B+
PEG
0.86B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
INOD
IT
49% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
52% below
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-9%/yr
+49%
1-yr DCF upside
+81%
+96%
5-yr DCF upside
+107%
+192%
10-yr DCF upside
+152%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
INOD
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Diluting shareholders
IT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
INODInnodata Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $2.2b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $125.14 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +39% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $122.75 (implying +91% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.92 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 50x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
ITGartner, Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $12.4b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $265.85 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.86 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $185.15 (implying -5% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 166% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
ROE -463% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where INOD and IT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.5 points in favor of INOD. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthINOD 97.5 · IT 49.0INOD +48.5
- ValueINOD 60.8 · IT 85.6IT +24.8
- QualityINOD 85.5 · IT 76.0INOD +9.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.