COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CTSH vs IT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CTSH scored 76.8, IT scored 68.3 — CTSH leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. IT's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but CTSH's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CTSH
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
76.8
$61.87 · $27.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.5
CTSH leads
IT
Gartner, Inc.
68.3
$195.90 · $12.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCTSH13.3x
- Fastest growthCTSH+6.5%
- Highest qualityCTSH81 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueIT-52%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CTSH
stronger →← stronger
IT
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
70
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
49
81
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
86
CTSH is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CTSH
IT
$2.5bB
FCF
$1.3bC+
+6.5%C+
Rev
+0.7%C
0.14B+
D/E
—
13.3xA
P/E
17.6xA-
0.97B+
PEG
0.86B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CTSH
IT
44% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
52% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-9%/yr
+64%
1-yr DCF upside
+81%
+80%
5-yr DCF upside
+107%
+106%
10-yr DCF upside
+152%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CTSH
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
IT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $27.9b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $87.03 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.97 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $63.94 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
ITGartner, Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $12.4b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $265.85 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.86 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $185.15 (implying -5% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 166% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
ROE -463% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
IT leads CTSH by 3.7 points (81.8 to 78.1), its sharpest advantage coming in PEG (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer CTSH, which trades about 48% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CTSH and IT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.5 points in favor of CTSH. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCTSH 69.6 · IT 49.0CTSH +20.6
- ValueCTSH 80.7 · IT 85.6IT +4.9
- QualityCTSH 80.6 · IT 76.0CTSH +4.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.