COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ACN vs IT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ACN scored 78.4, IT scored 68.3 — ACN leads.
Compare another set
ACN
Accenture plc
78.4
$185.28 · $113.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.1
ACN leads
IT
Gartner, Inc.
68.3
$195.90 · $12.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestACN14.8x
- Fastest growthACN+6.7%
- Highest qualityACN89 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueIT-52%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ACN
stronger →← stronger
IT
89
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
71
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
49
77
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
86
ACN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ACN
IT
$12.6bA-
FCF
$1.3bC+
+6.7%C+
Rev
+0.7%C
0.25B
D/E
—
14.8xA-
P/E
17.6xA-
1.33B
PEG
0.86B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ACN
IT
39% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
52% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-9%/yr
+58%
1-yr DCF upside
+81%
+64%
5-yr DCF upside
+107%
+73%
10-yr DCF upside
+152%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ACN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
IT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
ACNAccenture plc
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $113.4b. Down 36% from 52-week high of $291.09 — deep drawdown territory. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $179.11 (implying -3% upside).
Moat
ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 162% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $113.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Down 36% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
ITGartner, Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $12.4b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $265.85 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.86 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $185.15 (implying -5% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 166% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
ROE -463% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
IT leads ACN by 2 points (81.8 to 79.8), its sharpest advantage coming in PEG (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer ACN, which trades about 46% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ACN and IT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.1 points in favor of ACN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthACN 70.7 · IT 49.0ACN +21.7
- QualityACN 88.5 · IT 76.0ACN +12.5
- ValueACN 76.9 · IT 85.6IT +8.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.