COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ELF vs IPAR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ELF scored 56.3, IPAR scored 54.9 — ELF leads.
Compare another set
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
56.3
$101.94 · $6.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.4
ELF leads
IPAR
Interparfums, Inc.
54.9
$115.60 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestIPAR22.1x
- Fastest growthELF+31.2%
- Strongest balance sheetIPAR0.15
- Highest qualityIPAR89 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ELF
stronger →← stronger
IPAR
47
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
41
40
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
46
IPAR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ELF
IPAR
$280mC
FCF
$246mC
+31.2%A
Rev
+2.9%C
0.80B
D/E
0.15A-
104.0xD
P/E
22.1xB
1.37B
PEG
3.20D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ELF
IPAR
134% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
6% above
~28%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
-59%
1-yr DCF upside
-9%
-57%
5-yr DCF upside
-5%
-55%
10-yr DCF upside
+1%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ELF
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
IPAR
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
ELFe.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
Why now
Household & Personal Products · market cap $6.0b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $150.99 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $97.75 (implying -4% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 104.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.39 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
IPARInterparfums, Inc.
Why now
Household & Personal Products · market cap $3.7b. 11% off the 52-week high of $129.29. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $126.67 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
IPAR leads ELF by 2.1 points (59.8 to 57.7), its sharpest advantage coming in P/E (grade B). A contrarian could still prefer ELF for its stronger Rev (grade A).
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ELF and IPAR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.4 points in favor of ELF. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthELF 93.9 · IPAR 40.8ELF +53.1
- QualityELF 47.4 · IPAR 89.2IPAR +41.8
- ValueELF 40.1 · IPAR 45.5IPAR +5.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.