COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
IOSP vs STDN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. IOSP scored 60.9, STDN scored 44.8 — IOSP leads.
Compare another set
IOSP
Innospec Inc.
60.9
$94.73 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.1
IOSP leads
STDN
Standard Nuclear, Inc.
44.8
$11.94 · $1.9B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthSTDN+57.1%
- Highest qualityIOSP65 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueIOSP-13%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
IOSP
stronger →← stronger
STDN
65
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
45
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
40
IOSP is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
IOSP
STDN
$107mC
FCF
—
+2.9%C
Rev
+57.1%A
0.04A
D/E
—
19.3xB
P/E
—
0.66A-
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
IOSP
STDN
13% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~11%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-12%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+15%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+72%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
IOSP
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
STDN
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
The companies
IOSPInnospec Inc.
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $2.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $95.01 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.66 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $101.00 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
STDNStandard Nuclear, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $1.9b. 15% off the 52-week high of $13.98. Revenue growing +57% — in hypergrowth territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $16.00 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Higher-variance name — the thesis leans on growth and valuation rather than a long, settled track record, so it depends on execution continuing. Position size accordingly; a deep drawdown shouldn't change the thesis.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where IOSP and STDN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.1 points in favor of IOSP. The widest single difference is Value, where IOSP leads by 29.8 points.
- ValueIOSP 69.8 · STDN 40.0IOSP +29.8
- QualityIOSP 64.7 · STDN 45.0IOSP +19.7
- GrowthIOSP 50.0 · STDN 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.