COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
HAL vs INVX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HAL scored 54.8, INVX scored 45.5 — HAL leads.
Compare another set
HAL
Halliburton Company
54.8
$35.49 · $29.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
9.3
HAL leads
INVX
Innovex International, Inc.
45.5
$29.84 · $2.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestHAL18.6x
- Fastest growthINVX+15.0%
- Strongest balance sheetINVX0.07
- Highest qualityHAL66 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueHAL-40%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
HAL
stronger →← stronger
INVX
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
56
47
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
53
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
34
HAL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HAL
INVX
$1.7bC+
FCF
$130mC
+0.6%C
Rev
+15.0%B+
0.74C+
D/E
0.07A
18.6xB
P/E
33.5xC
0.83B+
PEG
1.55C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
HAL
INVX
40% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
27% below
~2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+28%
1-yr DCF upside
+8%
+66%
5-yr DCF upside
+36%
+147%
10-yr DCF upside
+91%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
HAL
Why this score
- Buying back stock
INVX
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
HALHalliburton Company
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $29.6b. 19% off the 52-week high of $43.59. PEG 0.83 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $43.20 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 108% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
INVXInnovex International, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $2.1b. 11% off the 52-week high of $33.71. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $33.40 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 34x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. ROE 6% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where HAL and INVX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 9.3 points in favor of HAL. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueHAL 53.0 · INVX 33.9HAL +19.1
- QualityHAL 66.4 · INVX 55.6HAL +10.8
- GrowthHAL 46.8 · INVX 50.0INVX +3.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.