COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
INVH vs IRT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. INVH scored 68.0, IRT scored 73.0 — IRT leads.
Compare another set
INVH
Invitation Homes Inc.
68.2Fin
$29.27 · $17.4B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
0.5
IRT leads
IRT
Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
68.7Fin
$16.31 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthINVH+4.2%
- Strongest balance sheetIRT0.70
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
INVH
IRT
4.0%B+
Yield
4.2%B+
+4.2%C+
Rev
+2.8%C
0.94B
D/E
0.70A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
INVHInvitation Homes Inc.
Why now
REIT - Residential · market cap $17.4b. 7% off the 52-week high of $31.33. 23 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $33.57 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Dividend payout 109% of earnings on a 4.0% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
IRTIndependence Realty Trust, Inc.
Why now
REIT - Residential · market cap $3.9b. 10% off the 52-week high of $18.18. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $19.50 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Dividend payout 383% of earnings on a 4.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 1% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.