COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
INTU vs PLTR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. INTU scored 85.0, PLTR scored 73.0 — INTU leads.
Compare another set
INTU
Intuit Inc.
85
$370.56 · $101.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.0
INTU leads
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
73
$179.94 · $432.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestINTU22.6x
- Fastest growthPLTR+78.9%
- Strongest balance sheetPLTR0.02
- Highest qualityINTU86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueINTU-33%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
INTU
stronger →← stronger
PLTR
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
99
80
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
47
INTU is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
INTU
PLTR
$7.8bB+
FCF
$3.4bB
+15.1%B+
Rev
+78.9%A
0.33B
D/E
0.02A
22.6xB+
P/E
153.8xD
0.94B+
PEG
2.35C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
INTU
PLTR
33% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
700% above
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
>60%/yr
+29%
1-yr DCF upside
-90%
+50%
5-yr DCF upside
-87%
+85%
10-yr DCF upside
-82%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
INTU
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
PLTR
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
INTUIntuit Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $101.4b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $705.08 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.94 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 33 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $446.02 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $432.4b. 13% off the 52-week high of $207.52. Revenue growing +79% — in hypergrowth territory. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $191.68 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Net margin 49% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 153.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.56 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 70.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where INTU and PLTR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.0 points in favor of INTU. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueINTU 80.1 · PLTR 47.0INTU +33.1
- GrowthINTU 89.6 · PLTR 98.8PLTR +9.2
- QualityINTU 85.6 · PLTR 83.9level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.