COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
INTU vs OTEX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. INTU scored 85.2, OTEX scored 65.2 — INTU leads.
Compare another set
INTU
Intuit Inc.
85.2
$348.00 · $95.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.0
INTU leads
OTEX
Open Text Corporation
65.2
$25.18 · $6.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestOTEX9.8x
- Fastest growthINTU+15.1%
- Strongest balance sheetINTU0.44
- Highest qualityINTU85 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueOTEX-54%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
INTU
stronger →← stronger
OTEX
85
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
52
81
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
INTU is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
INTU
OTEX
$7.8bB+
FCF
$808mC+
+15.1%B+
Rev
+1.5%C
0.44B
D/E
1.49C
21.1xB+
P/E
9.8xA
0.93B+
PEG
1.02B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
INTU
OTEX
36% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
54% below
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-12%/yr
+37%
1-yr DCF upside
+101%
+56%
5-yr DCF upside
+118%
+90%
10-yr DCF upside
+143%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
INTU
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
OTEX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
INTUIntuit Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $95.2b. Down 51% from 52-week high of $705.08 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.93 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 32 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $428.61 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 51% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
OTEXOpen Text Corporation
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $6.1b. Down 37% from 52-week high of $39.90 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $27.95 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 126% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 37% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where INTU and OTEX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.0 points in favor of INTU. The widest single difference is Growth, where INTU leads by 37.2 points.
- GrowthINTU 89.6 · OTEX 52.4INTU +37.2
- QualityINTU 85.0 · OTEX 68.7INTU +16.3
- ValueINTU 81.2 · OTEX 77.1INTU +4.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.