COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
INTU vs NVDA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. INTU scored 85.0, NVDA scored 85.9 — NVDA leads.
Compare another set
INTU
Intuit Inc.
85
$361.87 · $99.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.9
NVDA leads
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
85.9
$216.85 · $5.3T
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestINTU22.1x
- Fastest growthNVDA+70.7%
- Strongest balance sheetNVDA0.07
- Highest qualityNVDA88 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueINTU-35%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
INTU
stronger →← stronger
NVDA
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
99
80
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
73
NVDA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
INTU
NVDA
$7.8bB+
FCF
$119.1bA
+15.1%B+
Rev
+70.7%A
0.33B
D/E
0.07B+
22.1xB+
P/E
33.2xB
0.94B+
PEG
0.60A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
INTU
NVDA
35% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
228% above
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~50%/yr
+32%
1-yr DCF upside
-76%
+53%
5-yr DCF upside
-69%
+90%
10-yr DCF upside
-57%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
INTU
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
NVDA
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
INTUIntuit Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $99.0b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $705.08 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.94 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 33 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $446.02 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
Why now
Semiconductors · market cap $5.3T. 8% off the 52-week high of $236.54. Revenue growing +71% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.60 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 58 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $304.12 (implying +40% upside).
Moat
Net margin 63% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 82% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $5.3T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Beta 2.21 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. P/S 20.7x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model slightly favors INTU with an 87.8 score over NVDA's 86.2, primarily due to INTU's stronger Value pillar of 83 and its 43% discount to DCF fair value. However, a contrarian might prefer NVDA for its exceptional growth, evidenced by a perfect 100 Growth pillar and an A grade for 70.7% revenue expansion. Investors should note the extreme implied growth rates: INTU at -4% and NVDA at 48%.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where INTU and NVDA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.9 points in favor of NVDA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthINTU 89.6 · NVDA 99.5NVDA +9.9
- ValueINTU 80.1 · NVDA 72.6INTU +7.5
- QualityINTU 85.6 · NVDA 87.8level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.