COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
INTR vs NWG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. INTR scored 88.0, NWG scored 75.0 — INTR leads.
Compare another set
INTR
Inter & Co, Inc.
72.8Fin
$5.38 · $2.4B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
3.6
NWG leads
NWG
NatWest Group plc
76.4Fin
$18.87 · $74.9B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestINTR8.3x
- Fastest growthINTR+31.3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
INTR
NWG
+31.3%A
Rev
+13.3%B+
8.3xA-
P/E
9.3xA-
16.2%B+
ROE
14.8%B
1.16B+
P/B
1.42B+
2.0%B
Yield
5.0%A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
INTRInter & Co, Inc.
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $2.4b. Down 48% from 52-week high of $10.36 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.29 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $8.75 (implying +63% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Down 48% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Regulatory capital risk — stricter capital requirements (CCAR, Basel) can force a dividend cut or a capital raise; the largest banks are most exposed because they're held to the tightest standards.
NWGNatWest Group plc
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $74.9b. Trading near 52-week high of $19.42 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $21.54 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
Net margin 38% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $74.9b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.