COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
INOD vs IT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. INOD scored 77.9, IT scored 81.8 — IT leads.
Compare another set
INOD
Innodata Inc.
77.9
$55.40 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.9
IT leads
IT
Gartner, Inc.
81.8
$165.65 · $11.1B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
INOD
stronger →← stronger
IT
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
94
100
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
65
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
89
IT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
INOD
IT
$62mC-
FCF
$1.3bC+
+40.1%A
Rev
+2.3%C
0.03A-
D/E
—
49.5xC+
P/E
16.4xA-
0.87B+
PEG
0.64A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
INOD
IT
24% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
52% below
~20%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-10%/yr
-39%
1-yr DCF upside
+87%
-19%
5-yr DCF upside
+109%
+20%
10-yr DCF upside
+146%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
INOD
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Diluting shareholders
IT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
INODInnodata Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $1.8b. Down 56% from 52-week high of $125.14 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +40% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $122.75 (implying +122% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 56% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.89 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 49x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
ITGartner, Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $11.1b. Down 53% from 52-week high of $352.08 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $160.38 (implying -3% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 170% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 53% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.