Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. IFS scored 77.0, UCB scored 76.0 — IFS leads.
Compare another set
IFS
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.
Banks - Regional · Financial strength
73.2Fin
$53.84 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
5.9
IFS leads
UCB
United Community Banks, Inc.
Banks - Regional · Financial strength
67.3Fin
$33.38 · $4.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestIFS10.0x
Fastest growthUCB+11.9%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
IFS
UCB
+5.7%C+
Rev
+11.9%B
10.0xA-
P/E
10.9xB+
17.2%B+
ROE
10.3%B
1.65B
P/B
1.07A-
3.4%B
Yield
3.1%B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
IFSIntercorp Financial Services Inc.
Banks - Regional · $53.84 · beta 0.42
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $5.9b. 12% off the 52-week high of $61.38. PEG 0.68 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $66.41 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 36% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 17% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
UCBUnited Community Banks, Inc.
Banks - Regional · $33.38 · beta 0.90
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $4.0b. 10% off the 52-week high of $37.18. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $40.17 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 34% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is IFS or UCB the better stock?
IFS scores higher: IFS 77.0, UCB 76.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are IFS and UCB scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.