Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. IFS scored 77.0, BCH scored 64.0 — IFS leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. IFS's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BCH's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
IFS
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.
Banks - Regional · Financial strength
73.1Fin
$53.91 · $6.0B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
12.6
BCH leads
BCH
Banco de Chile
Banks - Regional · Financial strength
85.7Fin
$39.10 · $19.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestIFS10.0x
Fastest growthIFS+5.7%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
IFS
BCH
+5.7%C+
Rev
-1.6%D+
10.0xA-
P/E
15.0xC+
17.2%B+
ROE
21.6%A-
1.64B
P/B
0.69A
3.3%B
Yield
5.6%A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
IFSIntercorp Financial Services Inc.
Banks - Regional · $53.91 · beta 0.42
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $6.0b. 12% off the 52-week high of $61.38. PEG 0.68 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $66.14 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 36% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 17% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
BCHBanco de Chile
Banks - Regional · $39.10 · beta 0.06
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $19.7b. 16% off the 52-week high of $46.77. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $41.03 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 45% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 22% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Dividend payout 85% of earnings on a 5.6% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is IFS or BCH the better stock?
IFS scores higher: IFS 77.0, BCH 64.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are IFS and BCH scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.