COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
IESC vs TREX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. IESC scored 58.2, TREX scored 73.0 — TREX leads.
Compare another set
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
58.2
$685.04 · $27.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.8
TREX leads
TREX
Trex Company, Inc.
73
$47.01 · $4.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestTREX27.7x
- Fastest growthIESC+22.7%
- Strongest balance sheetIESC0.06
- Highest qualityTREX88 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
IESC
stronger →← stronger
TREX
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
91
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
68
27
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
TREX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
IESC
TREX
$228mC
FCF
$208mC
+22.7%A-
Rev
+7.0%C+
0.06A
D/E
0.30A-
60.8xD
P/E
27.7xB
—
PEG
1.00B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
IESC
TREX
788% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
69% above
>60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~23%/yr
-91%
1-yr DCF upside
-48%
-89%
5-yr DCF upside
-41%
-85%
10-yr DCF upside
-29%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
IESC
Why this score
- Durable high returns
TREX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
IESCIES Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $27.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $697.98 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +23%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
ROE 37% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trailing P/E 60.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Beta 1.82 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
TREXTrex Company, Inc.
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $4.8b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $66.06 — deep drawdown territory. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.67 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Beta 1.47 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where IESC and TREX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.8 points in favor of TREX. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueIESC 26.8 · TREX 65.1TREX +38.3
- GrowthIESC 90.9 · TREX 68.0IESC +22.9
- QualityIESC 81.0 · TREX 88.0TREX +7.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.