COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

IDT vs CHTR

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. IDT scored 42.3, CHTR scored 59.5 — CHTR leads.
Compare another set
IDT
IDT Corporation
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
42.3
$81.49 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
17.2
CHTR leads
CHTR
Charter Communications, Inc.
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
59.5
$103.38 · $13.4B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestCHTR2.9x
  • Fastest growthIDT+2.1%
  • Strongest balance sheetIDT0.00
  • Highest qualityIDT82 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueCHTR-83%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD42.3/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY82.2GROWTH39.3VALUE23.4
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD59.5/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY62.0GROWTH36.7VALUE92.7
IDTCHTRQuality82.262.0Growth39.336.7Value23.492.7
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-11%12%0.0x29xIDTCHTR

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFIDT$55mCHTR$4.4b
RevIDT+2.1%CHTR-0.6%
D/EIDT0.00CHTR4.42
P/EIDT23.6xCHTR2.9x
PEGIDT1.42CHTR0.62
IDT
stronger →← stronger
CHTR
82
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
39
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
37
23
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
93
IDT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
IDT
CHTR
$55mC-
FCF
$4.4bB
+2.1%C
Rev
-0.6%D+
0.00A
D/E
4.42D
23.6xB
P/E
2.9xA
1.42B
PEG
0.62A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
IDT
CHTR
75% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
83% below
~16%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
decline
-42%
1-yr DCF upside
+507%
-43%
5-yr DCF upside
+473%
-45%
10-yr DCF upside
+427%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
IDT
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
CHTR
No notable signals flagged.
IDTIDT Corporation
Telecom Services · $81.49 · beta 0.60
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $2.0b. Trading near 52-week high of $82.31 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety.
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
CHTRCharter Communications, Inc.
Telecom Services · $103.38 · beta 0.69
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $13.4b. Down 62% from 52-week high of $268.77 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.62 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $175.11 (implying +69% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 4.42 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 62% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where IDT and CHTR diverge

On the headline score the gap is 17.2 points in favor of CHTR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.

Common questions

Is CHTR or IDT the better stock?

CHTR scores higher: CHTR 59.5, IDT 42.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

Where do CHTR and IDT differ most?

The widest gap is value, where CHTR leads by 69 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.

How are CHTR and IDT scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.