Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. IDT scored 42.3, AD scored 67.9 — AD leads.
Compare another set
IDT
IDT Corporation
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
42.3
$81.49 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
25.6
AD leads
AD
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
67.9
$33.39 · $2.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthAD+58.3%
Strongest balance sheetIDT0.00
Highest qualityIDT82 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
IDT
stronger →← stronger
AD
82
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
57
39
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
69
23
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
79
AD is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
IDT
AD
$55mC-
FCF
-$338mF
+2.1%C
Rev
+58.3%A
0.00A
D/E
0.94B
23.6xB
P/E
—
1.42B
PEG
14.30D
—
P/S
13.5xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
IDT
AD
75% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~16%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
—
-42%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-43%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-45%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
IDT
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
AD
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
IDTIDT Corporation
Telecom Services · $81.49 · beta 0.60
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $2.0b. Trading near 52-week high of $82.31 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety.
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
ADArray Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
Telecom Services · $33.39 · beta 0.30
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $2.9b. Down 45% from 52-week high of $60.82 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +58% — in hypergrowth territory. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $43.33 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 23% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$338m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 45% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. P/S 13.5x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where IDT and AD diverge
On the headline score the gap is 25.6 points in favor of AD. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueIDT 23.4 · AD 79.1AD +55.7
GrowthIDT 39.3 · AD 69.2AD +29.9
QualityIDT 82.2 · AD 57.1IDT +25.1
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is AD or IDT the better stock?
AD scores higher: AD 67.9, IDT 42.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do AD and IDT differ most?
The widest gap is value, where AD leads by 56 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are AD and IDT scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.