COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
HURN vs RBA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HURN scored 70.8, RBA scored 63.8 — HURN leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. RBA's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but HURN's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
70.8
$161.64 · $2.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.0
HURN leads
RBA
RB Global, Inc.
63.8
$87.02 · $16.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestHURN24.4x
- Fastest growthHURN+11.8%
- Strongest balance sheetRBA0.78
- Highest qualityHURN67 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueRBA-4%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
HURN
stronger →← stronger
RBA
67
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
60
87
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
71
61
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
HURN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HURN
RBA
$124mC
FCF
$611mC+
+11.8%B
Rev
+9.7%B
2.25D
D/E
0.78B
24.4xB+
P/E
37.5xC+
1.47B
PEG
1.01B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
HURN
RBA
8% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% below
~12%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
-21%
1-yr DCF upside
-7%
-8%
5-yr DCF upside
+4%
+15%
10-yr DCF upside
+23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
HURN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
RBA
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $2.6b. 13% off the 52-week high of $186.78. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $190.75 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.25 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
RBARB Global, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $16.1b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $119.58 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $128.91 (implying +48% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 126% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 38x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where HURN and RBA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.0 points in favor of HURN. The widest single difference is Growth, where HURN leads by 15.7 points.
- GrowthHURN 86.6 · RBA 70.9HURN +15.7
- QualityHURN 67.4 · RBA 59.9HURN +7.5
- ValueHURN 60.7 · RBA 61.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.