COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
HURN vs KFY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HURN scored 70.8, KFY scored 71.7 — KFY leads.
Compare another set
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
70.8
$162.45 · $2.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.9
KFY leads
KFY
Korn Ferry
71.7
$84.59 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKFY16.2x
- Fastest growthHURN+11.8%
- Strongest balance sheetKFY0.30
- Highest qualityKFY77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueKFY-8%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
HURN
stronger →← stronger
KFY
67
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
87
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
68
61
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
KFY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HURN
KFY
$124mC
FCF
$324mC
+11.8%B
Rev
+6.4%C+
2.25D
D/E
0.30A-
24.4xB+
P/E
16.2xA-
1.47B
PEG
1.20B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
HURN
KFY
9% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% below
~12%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
-21%
1-yr DCF upside
+1%
-8%
5-yr DCF upside
+9%
+15%
10-yr DCF upside
+22%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
HURN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
KFY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $2.6b. 13% off the 52-week high of $186.78. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $190.75 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.25 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
KFYKorn Ferry
Why now
Staffing & Employment Services · market cap $4.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $85.97 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $81.00 (implying -4% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
KFY leads HURN by 0.9 points (71.7 to 70.8), its sharpest advantage coming in D/E (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer HURN for its stronger Rev (grade B). All screen as growth-type names but sit in different sectors (Consulting Services versus Staffing & Employment Services), so their grades are relative to different peer sets.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where HURN and KFY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.9 points in favor of KFY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthHURN 86.6 · KFY 68.2HURN +18.4
- ValueHURN 60.7 · KFY 70.6KFY +9.9
- QualityHURN 67.4 · KFY 76.6KFY +9.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.