COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FCN vs HURN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FCN scored 75.1, HURN scored 70.8 — FCN leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. FCN's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but HURN's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
75.1
$153.49 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.3
FCN leads
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
70.8
$162.45 · $2.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFCN18.6x
- Fastest growthHURN+11.8%
- Strongest balance sheetFCN0.95
- Highest qualityFCN69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueFCN-41%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FCN
stronger →← stronger
HURN
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
87
83
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
FCN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FCN
HURN
$359mC
FCF
$124mC
+7.1%B
Rev
+11.8%B
0.95C+
D/E
2.25D
18.6xA-
P/E
24.4xB+
0.96B+
PEG
1.47B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FCN
HURN
41% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
9% above
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
+42%
1-yr DCF upside
-21%
+71%
5-yr DCF upside
-8%
+123%
10-yr DCF upside
+15%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FCN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
HURN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $4.2b. 19% off the 52-week high of $189.30. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $2.6b. 13% off the 52-week high of $186.78. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $190.75 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.25 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
FCN leads HURN by 4.3 points (75.1 to 70.8), its sharpest advantage coming in D/E (grade C+). Note they play different roles — FCN screens as value, HURN screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FCN and HURN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.3 points in favor of FCN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueFCN 82.7 · HURN 60.7FCN +22.0
- GrowthFCN 74.6 · HURN 86.6HURN +12.0
- QualityFCN 68.6 · HURN 67.4level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.