Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HURN scored 69.6, EFX scored 66.7 — HURN leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. EFX's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but HURN's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
Consulting Services · Quality-Growth
69.6
$167.05 · $2.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.9
HURN leads
EFX
Equifax Inc.
Consulting Services · Quality-Growth
66.7
$145.78 · $17.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestHURN24.9x
Fastest growthHURN+11.7%
Strongest balance sheetEFX1.21
Highest qualityEFX70 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
HURN
stronger →← stronger
EFX
67
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
83
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
70
60
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
60
HURN and EFX split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HURN
EFX
$104mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+11.7%B
Rev
+6.9%C+
2.25D
D/E
1.21C
24.9xB
P/E
25.7xB
1.47B
PEG
1.23B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
HURN
EFX
37% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
21% above
~17%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
-36%
1-yr DCF upside
-21%
-27%
5-yr DCF upside
-17%
-11%
10-yr DCF upside
-11%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
HURN
Why this score
Buying back stock
EFX
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
The companies
HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc.
Consulting Services · $167.05 · beta 0.09
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $2.7b. 11% off the 52-week high of $186.78. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $190.75 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 2.25 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
EFXEquifax Inc.
Consulting Services · $145.78 · beta 1.34
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $17.1b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $238.94 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $203.10 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 160% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
HURN leads EFX by 3.5 points (76.5 to 73.0), its sharpest advantage coming in P/E (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer EFX for its stronger D/E (grade C).
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where HURN and EFX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.9 points in favor of HURN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
GrowthHURN 83.1 · EFX 70.1HURN +13.0
QualityHURN 67.1 · EFX 70.2EFX +3.1
ValueHURN 60.5 · EFX 60.2level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is HURN or EFX the better stock?
HURN scores higher: HURN 69.6, EFX 66.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do HURN and EFX differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where HURN leads by 13 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are HURN and EFX scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.