COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
EFX vs HURN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EFX scored 66.7, HURN scored 70.8 — HURN leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. EFX's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but HURN's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
EFX
Equifax Inc.
66.7
$192.62 · $22.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.1
HURN leads
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
70.8
$161.64 · $2.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestHURN24.4x
- Fastest growthHURN+11.8%
- Strongest balance sheetEFX1.21
- Highest qualityEFX71 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EFX
stronger →← stronger
HURN
71
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
81
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
87
52
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
HURN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EFX
HURN
$1.1bC+
FCF
$124mC
+10.3%B
Rev
+11.8%B
1.21C
D/E
2.25D
33.9xC+
P/E
24.4xB+
1.92C+
PEG
1.47B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EFX
HURN
23% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% above
~17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
-33%
1-yr DCF upside
-21%
-19%
5-yr DCF upside
-8%
+7%
10-yr DCF upside
+15%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EFX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
HURN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
EFXEquifax Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $22.6b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $271.84 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $210.52 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 160% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 34x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $2.6b. 13% off the 52-week high of $186.78. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $190.75 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.25 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
HURN leads EFX by 3.5 points (76.5 to 73.0), its sharpest advantage coming in P/E (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer EFX for its stronger D/E (grade C).
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EFX and HURN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.1 points in favor of HURN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueEFX 51.9 · HURN 60.7HURN +8.8
- GrowthEFX 80.9 · HURN 86.6HURN +5.7
- QualityEFX 70.6 · HURN 67.4EFX +3.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.