COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
EPAC vs HUBB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EPAC scored 78.6, HUBB scored 55.1 — EPAC leads.
Compare another set
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
78.6
$37.30 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
23.5
EPAC leads
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
55.1
$470.28 · $24.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestEPAC21.1x
- Fastest growthHUBB+7.2%
- Strongest balance sheetEPAC0.44
- Highest qualityEPAC86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEPAC-12%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EPAC
stronger →← stronger
HUBB
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
61
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
92
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
30
EPAC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EPAC
HUBB
$112mC
FCF
$909mC+
+4.3%C+
Rev
+7.2%B
0.44B+
D/E
1.42C
21.1xB+
P/E
27.9xB
0.34A
PEG
2.15C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EPAC
HUBB
12% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
40% above
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~16%/yr
+3%
1-yr DCF upside
-36%
+13%
5-yr DCF upside
-29%
+31%
10-yr DCF upside
-16%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EPAC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
HUBB
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $1.9b. 17% off the 52-week high of $45.00. PEG 0.34 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 120% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
HUBBHubbell Incorporated
Why now
Electrical Equipment & Parts · market cap $24.8b. 17% off the 52-week high of $565.50. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $564.82 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 100% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EPAC and HUBB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 23.5 points in favor of EPAC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueEPAC 91.7 · HUBB 29.6EPAC +62.1
- GrowthEPAC 61.4 · HUBB 74.7HUBB +13.3
- QualityEPAC 86.2 · HUBB 75.6EPAC +10.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.