COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
HSY vs SYY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HSY scored 65.9, SYY scored 58.8 — HSY leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. HSY's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but SYY's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
HSY
The Hershey Company
65.9
$186.46 · $37.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.1
HSY leads
SYY
Sysco Corporation
58.8
$84.10 · $40.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSYY23.0x
- Fastest growthHSY+7.7%
- Strongest balance sheetHSY1.30
- Highest qualityHSY82 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueHSY-14%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
HSY
stronger →← stronger
SYY
82
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
71
76
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
63
46
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
46
HSY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HSY
SYY
$2.2bB
FCF
$1.8bC+
+7.7%B
Rev
+3.4%C+
1.30C+
D/E
5.61D
25.4xC+
P/E
23.0xB
1.07B+
PEG
1.55C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
HSY
SYY
14% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
1% above
~6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
-1%
1-yr DCF upside
-4%
+17%
5-yr DCF upside
-1%
+49%
10-yr DCF upside
+5%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
HSY
No notable signals flagged.
SYY
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
HSYThe Hershey Company
Why now
Confectioners · market cap $37.5b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $239.48 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $205.81 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 150% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
SYYSysco Corporation
Why now
Food Distribution · market cap $40.2b. 8% off the 52-week high of $91.85. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $90.31 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
ROE 76% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 105% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 5.61 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 2.1% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where HSY and SYY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.1 points in favor of HSY. The widest single difference is Growth, where HSY leads by 13.1 points.
- GrowthHSY 75.9 · SYY 62.8HSY +13.1
- QualityHSY 81.7 · SYY 70.5HSY +11.2
- ValueHSY 46.1 · SYY 45.9level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.