COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
COCO vs HSY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. COCO scored 69.0, HSY scored 67.6 — COCO leads.
Compare another set
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
69
$66.45 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.4
COCO leads
HSY
The Hershey Company
67.6
$184.23 · $37.0B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
COCO
stronger →← stronger
HSY
85
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
97
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
40
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
50
COCO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
COCO
HSY
$124mC
FCF
$2.2bB
+26.1%A-
Rev
+7.7%B
0.04A
D/E
1.30C+
35.5xC
P/E
24.9xC+
1.96C+
PEG
1.04B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
COCO
HSY
31% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
16% below
~16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
-35%
1-yr DCF upside
+0%
-24%
5-yr DCF upside
+18%
-3%
10-yr DCF upside
+51%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
COCO
Why this score
- Durable high returns
HSY
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
COCOThe Vita Coco Company, Inc.
Why now
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · market cap $3.8b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $85.83 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $83.89 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 36x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
HSYThe Hershey Company
Why now
Confectioners · market cap $37.0b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $239.48 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $205.81 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 150% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where COCO and HSY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.4 points in favour of COCO. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCOCO 97.0 · HSY 75.9COCO +21.1
- ValueCOCO 39.9 · HSY 49.8HSY +9.9
- QualityCOCO 84.8 · HSY 81.5COCO +3.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.