COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
BRBR vs HSY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BRBR scored 72.0, HSY scored 67.6 — BRBR leads.
Compare another set
BRBR
BellRing Brands, Inc.
72
$10.85 · $1.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.4
BRBR leads
HSY
The Hershey Company
67.6
$184.23 · $37.0B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BRBR
stronger →← stronger
HSY
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
67
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
97
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
50
HSY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BRBR
HSY
$225mC
FCF
$2.2bB
+16.1%B+
Rev
+7.7%B
—
D/E
1.30C+
8.2xA
P/E
24.9xC+
0.51A-
PEG
1.04B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BRBR
HSY
85% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
16% below
decline
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
+413%
1-yr DCF upside
+0%
+582%
5-yr DCF upside
+18%
+954%
10-yr DCF upside
+51%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BRBR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Short track record
HSY
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
BRBRBellRing Brands, Inc.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $1.3b. Down 75% from 52-week high of $43.02 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.51 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $14.71 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 75% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -37% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
HSYThe Hershey Company
Why now
Confectioners · market cap $37.0b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $239.48 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $205.81 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 150% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BRBR and HSY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.4 points in favour of BRBR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueBRBR 97.5 · HSY 49.8BRBR +47.7
- QualityBRBR 62.1 · HSY 81.5HSY +19.4
- GrowthBRBR 66.7 · HSY 75.9HSY +9.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.