COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CCU vs HRL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCU scored 58.7, HRL scored 47.7 — CCU leads.
Compare another set
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
58.7
$12.66 · $2.3B
Score gap
11.0
CCU leads
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
47.7
$24.09 · $13.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCCU20.4x
- Fastest growthCCU+13.2%
- Strongest balance sheetHRL0.04
- Highest qualityCCU66 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCCU-23%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCU
stronger →← stronger
HRL
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
59
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
56
50
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
33
CCU is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCU
HRL
$150mC
FCF
$693mC+
+13.2%B+
Rev
+2.5%C
0.82B
D/E
0.04A
20.4xB
P/E
28.0xC+
1.73C+
PEG
1.68C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCU
HRL
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
26% above
~5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~9%/yr
+7%
1-yr DCF upside
-22%
+30%
5-yr DCF upside
-21%
+70%
10-yr DCF upside
-19%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCU
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cut its dividend
- Foreign reporter (CLP)
HRL
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
CCUCompañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
Why now
Beverages - Brewers · market cap $2.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $15.36. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $11.64 (implying -8% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
HRLHormel Foods Corporation
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $13.3b. 17% off the 52-week high of $29.10. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $27.25 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 148% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 137% of earnings on a 4.9% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 3.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 6% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCU and HRL diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.0 points in favor of CCU. The widest single difference is Growth, where CCU leads by 28.0 points.
- GrowthCCU 84.2 · HRL 56.2CCU +28.0
- ValueCCU 50.3 · HRL 32.6CCU +17.7
- QualityCCU 65.6 · HRL 59.1CCU +6.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.