Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HRI scored 48.2, LIME scored 65.1 — LIME leads.
Compare another set
HRI
Herc Holdings Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · Quality-Growth
48.2
$123.46 · $4.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.9
LIME leads
LIME
Neutron Holdings, Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · Quality-Growth
65.1
$28.58 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthLIME+29.1%
Strongest balance sheetLIME0.20
Highest qualityLIME69 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
HRI
stronger →← stronger
LIME
42
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
91
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
54
29
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
74
LIME is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HRI
LIME
-$128mF
FCF
$40mC-
+28.3%A-
Rev
+29.1%A-
5.06D
D/E
0.20A-
0.8xA-
P/S
—
0.04A
PEG
—
—
P/E
5.6xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
HRI
LIME
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
98% above
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~33%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-61%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-49%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-26%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
HRI
No notable signals flagged.
LIME
Why this score
Short track record
The companies
HRIHerc Holdings Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · $123.46 · beta 2.05
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $4.1b. Down 34% from 52-week high of $188.35 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.04 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $188.25 (implying +52% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 5.06 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$128m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 80.7x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating.
LIMENeutron Holdings, Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · $28.58
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $1.8b. Down 36% from 52-week high of $44.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +29% — in hypergrowth territory. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $39.43 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Down 36% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where HRI and LIME diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.9 points in favor of LIME. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueHRI 29.5 · LIME 73.9LIME +44.4
GrowthHRI 91.0 · LIME 54.3HRI +36.7
QualityHRI 41.9 · LIME 68.9LIME +27.0
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is LIME or HRI the better stock?
LIME scores higher: LIME 65.1, HRI 48.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do LIME and HRI differ most?
The widest gap is value, where LIME leads by 44 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are LIME and HRI scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.