COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FTDR vs HRB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FTDR scored 62.2, HRB scored 76.1 — HRB leads.
Compare another set
FTDR
Frontdoor, Inc.
62.2
$83.24 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.9
HRB leads
HRB
H&R Block, Inc.
76.1
$54.05 · $6.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestHRB9.5x
- Fastest growthFTDR+9.3%
- Highest qualityHRB96 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueHRB-51%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FTDR
stronger →← stronger
HRB
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
96
78
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
64
38
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
HRB is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FTDR
HRB
$386mC
FCF
$756mC+
+9.3%B
Rev
+4.9%C+
4.17D
D/E
—
22.0xB
P/E
9.5xA
2.38C
PEG
0.66A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FTDR
HRB
18% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
51% below
~12%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-9%/yr
-23%
1-yr DCF upside
+82%
-16%
5-yr DCF upside
+105%
-4%
10-yr DCF upside
+144%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FTDR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Short track record
HRB
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
FTDRFrontdoor, Inc.
Why now
Personal Services · market cap $5.7b. 11% off the 52-week high of $93.43. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $98.00 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 96% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 141% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 4.17 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.50 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
HRBH&R Block, Inc.
Why now
Personal Services · market cap $6.7b. 8% off the 52-week high of $58.67. PEG 0.66 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $50.67 (implying -6% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 103% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FTDR and HRB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.9 points in favor of HRB. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueFTDR 37.8 · HRB 71.8HRB +34.0
- QualityFTDR 81.1 · HRB 95.6HRB +14.5
- GrowthFTDR 78.4 · HRB 64.1FTDR +14.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.