COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ANDG vs HRB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ANDG scored 33.9, HRB scored 76.1 — HRB leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. HRB's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but ANDG's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
ANDG
Andersen Group Inc.
33.9
$50.16 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
42.2
HRB leads
HRB
H&R Block, Inc.
76.1
$54.05 · $6.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestHRB9.5x
- Fastest growthANDG+14.6%
- Highest qualityHRB96 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueHRB-51%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ANDG
stronger →← stronger
HRB
59
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
96
83
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
64
8
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
HRB is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ANDG
HRB
$174mC
FCF
$756mC+
+14.6%B+
Rev
+4.9%C+
111.5xD
P/E
9.5xA
5.11D
PEG
0.66A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ANDG
HRB
47% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
51% below
~23%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-9%/yr
-46%
1-yr DCF upside
+82%
-32%
5-yr DCF upside
+105%
-4%
10-yr DCF upside
+144%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ANDG
Why this score
- Short track record
HRB
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
ANDGAndersen Group Inc.
Why now
Personal Services · market cap $5.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $50.76 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.83 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trailing P/E 111.5x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Currently unprofitable (margin -0.3%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
HRBH&R Block, Inc.
Why now
Personal Services · market cap $6.7b. 8% off the 52-week high of $58.67. PEG 0.66 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $50.67 (implying -6% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 103% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ANDG and HRB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 42.2 points in favor of HRB. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueANDG 8.0 · HRB 71.8HRB +63.8
- QualityANDG 58.6 · HRB 95.6HRB +37.0
- GrowthANDG 83.3 · HRB 64.1ANDG +19.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.