Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HR scored 64.0, DOC scored 67.0 — DOC leads.
Compare another set
HR
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated
REIT - Healthcare Facilities · Financial strength
66.8Fin
$17.22 · $6.0B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
4.8
DOC leads
DOC
Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities · Financial strength
71.6Fin
$18.98 · $13.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthDOC+4.5%
Strongest balance sheetHR1.03
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HR
DOC
5.6%A-
Yield
6.5%A-
-7.8%D
Rev
+4.5%C+
1.03B
D/E
1.09B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
HRHealthcare Realty Trust Incorporated
REIT - Healthcare Facilities · $17.22 · beta 0.84
Why now
REIT - Healthcare Facilities · market cap $6.0b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $22.04 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -8% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $21.42 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Revenue contracting -8% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Currently unprofitable (margin -7.6%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Dividend payout 827% of earnings on a 5.6% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
DOCHealthpeak Properties, Inc.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities · $18.98 · beta 0.99
Why now
REIT - Healthcare Facilities · market cap $13.5b. 17% off the 52-week high of $22.95. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.95 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Dividend payout 349% of earnings on a 6.5% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 3% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is DOC or HR the better stock?
DOC scores higher: DOC 67.0, HR 64.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are DOC and HR scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.