COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
HMY vs USAS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HMY scored 72.8, USAS scored 21.0 — HMY leads.
Compare another set
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining Company Ltd
72.8
$23.54 · $221.0B
Score gap
51.8
HMY leads
USAS
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation
21
$5.39 · $1.8B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthHMY+20.9%
- Strongest balance sheetHMY0.05
- Highest qualityHMY89 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
HMY
stronger →← stronger
USAS
89
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
22
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
87
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
8
HMY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HMY
USAS
—
FCF
-$59mF
+20.9%A-
Rev
+17.7%B+
0.05A
D/E
0.20B+
12.5xB+
P/E
—
—
P/S
10.0xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
HMY
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
USAS
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
HMYHarmony Gold Mining Company Ltd
Why now
Metals & Mining · market cap $221.0b. Down 100% from 52-week high of $42888.00 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +21%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Net margin 20% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $221.0b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Down 100% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.36 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
USASAmericas Gold and Silver Corporation
Why now
Other Industrial Metals & Mining · market cap $1.8b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $10.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$59m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -26.3%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where HMY and USAS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 51.8 points in favor of HMY. The widest single difference is Value, where HMY leads by 78.3 points.
- ValueHMY 86.7 · USAS 8.4HMY +78.3
- QualityHMY 89.2 · USAS 22.0HMY +67.2
- GrowthHMY 50.0 · USAS 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.