COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
HIW vs SLG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HIW scored 59.0, SLG scored 73.0 — SLG leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. SLG's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but HIW's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
HIW
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
80.3Fin
$31.15 · $3.5B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
15.8
HIW leads
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
64.5Fin
$57.54 · $4.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthSLG+8.4%
- Strongest balance sheetHIW1.33
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HIW
SLG
6.3%A-
Yield
4.3%B+
-2.4%D+
Rev
+8.4%B
1.33C+
D/E
1.43C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
HIWHighwoods Properties, Inc.
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $3.5b. 12% off the 52-week high of $35.44. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $31.44 (implying +1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Dividend payout 132% of earnings on a 6.3% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
SLGSL Green Realty Corp.
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $4.4b. 13% off the 52-week high of $66.29. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $57.24 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -16.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Beta 1.59 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Dividend payout 15375% of earnings on a 4.3% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.