COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
HHH vs NMRK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HHH scored 71.0, NMRK scored 80.0 — NMRK leads.
Compare another set
HHH
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.
58.6Fin
$64.80 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
3.6
NMRK leads
NMRK
Newmark Group, Inc.
62.2Fin
$15.83 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthNMRK+20.3%
- Strongest balance sheetNMRK1.30
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HHH
NMRK
0.0%C
Yield
1.5%C+
-15.8%F
Rev
+20.3%A-
1.35C+
D/E
1.30C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
HHHHoward Hughes Holdings Inc.
Why now
Real Estate - Development · market cap $3.9b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $91.07 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -16% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $89.67 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Revenue contracting -16% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
NMRKNewmark Group, Inc.
Why now
Real Estate Services · market cap $3.9b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $19.84 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +20%, comfortably above the S&P median. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $19.75 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Beta 1.67 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Net margin 4.1% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.