Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HD scored 47.0, TPR scored 73.9 — TPR leads.
Compare another set
HD
The Home Depot, Inc.
Home Improvement Retail · Quality-Growth
47
$290.74 · $290.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
26.9
TPR leads
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
Luxury Goods · Quality-Growth
73.9
$116.24 · $23.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestTPR16.0x
Fastest growthTPR+14.2%
Strongest balance sheetHD3.80
Highest qualityTPR82 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueTPR-3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
HD
stronger →← stronger
TPR
79
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
43
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
30
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
64
TPR is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
HD
TPR
$15.1bA-
FCF
$1.8bC+
+2.5%C
Rev
+14.2%B+
3.80C
D/E
5.72D
20.3xB
P/E
16.0xB+
1.56C+
PEG
1.66C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
HD
TPR
27% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
~10%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
-22%
1-yr DCF upside
-6%
-21%
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
-20%
10-yr DCF upside
+18%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
HD
Why this score
Durable high returns
TPR
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
The companies
HDThe Home Depot, Inc.
Home Improvement Retail · $290.74 · beta 1.00
Why now
Home Improvement Retail · market cap $290.1b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $397.63 — deep drawdown territory. 32 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $378.34 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 86% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 106% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash. $290.1b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
D/E 3.80 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
TPRTapestry, Inc.
Luxury Goods · $116.24 · beta 1.43
Why now
Luxury Goods · market cap $23.1b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $164.80 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $166.50 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
D/E 5.72 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.43 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where HD and TPR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 26.9 points in favor of TPR. The widest single difference is Value, where TPR leads by 34.2 points.
ValueHD 30.3 · TPR 64.5TPR +34.2
GrowthHD 43.0 · TPR 76.0TPR +33.0
QualityHD 79.5 · TPR 82.3level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is TPR or HD the better stock?
TPR scores higher: TPR 73.9, HD 47.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do TPR and HD differ most?
The widest gap is value, where TPR leads by 34 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. TPR also leads growth, while quality is effectively level between them.
How are TPR and HD scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.