COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CPA vs HAFN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CPA scored 67.3, HAFN scored 72.0 — HAFN leads.
Compare another set
CPA
Copa Holdings, S.A.
67.3
$131.28 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.7
HAFN leads
HAFN
Hafnia Limited
72
$8.16 · $4.1B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCPA8.6x
- Fastest growthHAFN+7.4%
- Strongest balance sheetHAFN0.40
- Highest qualityHAFN94 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueHAFN-66%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CPA
stronger →← stronger
HAFN
78
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
94
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
43
78
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
96
HAFN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CPA
HAFN
$335mC
FCF
$981mC+
+5.0%C+
Rev
+7.4%B
0.89C+
D/E
0.40B+
8.6xA
P/E
9.1xA
0.94B+
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CPA
HAFN
9% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
66% below
~7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
-6%
1-yr DCF upside
+226%
+10%
5-yr DCF upside
+193%
+38%
10-yr DCF upside
+153%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CPA
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
HAFN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Short track record
The companies
CPACopa Holdings, S.A.
Why now
Airlines · market cap $5.9b. 18% off the 52-week high of $160.47. PEG 0.94 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $178.40 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
HAFNHafnia Limited
Why now
Marine Shipping · market cap $4.1b. 14% off the 52-week high of $9.54.
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 34% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
HAFN leads CPA by 4.7 points (72.0 to 67.3), its sharpest advantage coming in D/E (grade B+). A contrarian could still prefer CPA, which trades about 10% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. All screen as value-type names but sit in different sectors (Airlines versus Marine Shipping), so their grades are relative to different peer sets.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CPA and HAFN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.7 points in favor of HAFN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueCPA 78.4 · HAFN 96.3HAFN +17.9
- QualityCPA 77.8 · HAFN 93.7HAFN +15.9
- GrowthCPA 50.0 · HAFN 43.1CPA +6.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.