COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026

GXO vs SKYW

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GXO scored 50.6, SKYW scored 62.0 — SKYW leads.
Compare another set
GXO
GXO Logistics, Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · Quality-Growth
50.6
$47.98 · $5.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.4
SKYW leads
SKYW
SkyWest, Inc.
Airlines · Quality-Growth
62
$99.39 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestSKYW9.9x
  • Fastest growthSKYW+9.1%
  • Strongest balance sheetSKYW0.86
  • Highest qualitySKYW70 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueSKYW-68%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD50.6/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY39.2GROWTH62.2VALUE53.3
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD62.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY70.5GROWTH50.0VALUE67.6
GXOSKYWQuality39.270.5Growth62.250.0Value53.367.6
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-2%19%4.0x48xGXOSKYW

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFGXO$180mSKYW$909m
RevGXO+7.6%SKYW+9.1%
D/EGXO2.02SKYW0.86
P/EGXO42.5xSKYW9.9x
PEGGXO1.29SKYW1.66
GXO
stronger →← stronger
SKYW
39
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
62
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
53
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
SKYW is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
GXO
SKYW
$180mC
FCF
$909mC+
+7.6%B
Rev
+9.1%B
2.02C
D/E
0.86C+
42.5xC
P/E
9.9xA
1.29B
PEG
1.66C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
GXO
SKYW
122% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
68% below
~32%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-20%/yr
-62%
1-yr DCF upside
+181%
-55%
5-yr DCF upside
+215%
-43%
10-yr DCF upside
+270%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
GXO
No notable signals flagged.
SKYW
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Cyclical growth
GXOGXO Logistics, Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · $47.98 · beta 1.55
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $5.5b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $66.85 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $68.71 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 137% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.02 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.55 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 42x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
SKYWSkyWest, Inc.
Airlines · $99.39 · beta 1.44
Why now
Airlines · market cap $3.9b. 20% off the 52-week high of $123.67. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $126.50 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where GXO and SKYW diverge

On the headline score the gap is 11.4 points in favor of SKYW. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.