Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GXO scored 52.7, PBI scored 62.7 — PBI leads.
Compare another set
GXO
GXO Logistics, Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · Quality-Growth
52.7
$46.56 · $5.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.0
PBI leads
PBI
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · Quality-Growth
62.7
$16.80 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestPBI13.8x
Fastest growthGXO+12.5%
Highest qualityPBI82 / 100
Largest discount to fair valuePBI-31%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GXO
stronger →← stronger
PBI
39
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
85
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
39
44
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
PBI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GXO
PBI
$180mC
FCF
$415mC
+12.5%B+
Rev
-5.3%D
2.02C
D/E
Negative equity
41.2xC
P/E
13.8xA-
1.14B+
PEG
0.63A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GXO
PBI
122% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
31% below
~33%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-11%/yr
-61%
1-yr DCF upside
+62%
-55%
5-yr DCF upside
+45%
-45%
10-yr DCF upside
+26%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $5.3b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $66.85 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $68.59 (implying +47% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 137% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
D/E 2.02 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.57 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $2.3b. 12% off the 52-week high of $19.07. Revenue -5% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. PEG 0.63 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $19.56 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income, mostly because of cash released from working capital ($120m) — a release that doesn't repeat every year the way earnings can.
Risk
Revenue contracting -5% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Beta 1.65 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GXO and PBI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.0 points in favor of PBI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
GrowthGXO 85.3 · PBI 38.8GXO +46.5
QualityGXO 38.8 · PBI 82.1PBI +43.3
ValueGXO 44.1 · PBI 77.2PBI +33.1
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is PBI or GXO the better stock?
PBI scores higher: PBI 62.7, GXO 52.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do PBI and GXO differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where GXO leads by 47 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are PBI and GXO scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.