COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026

GXO vs HAFN

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GXO scored 50.6, HAFN scored 72.0 — HAFN leads.
Compare another set
GXO
GXO Logistics, Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · Quality-Growth
50.6
$47.98 · $5.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.4
HAFN leads
HAFN
Hafnia Limited
Marine Shipping · Quality-Growth
72
$7.77 · $3.9B
  • CheapestHAFN8.6x
  • Fastest growthGXO+7.6%
  • Strongest balance sheetHAFN0.40
  • Highest qualityHAFN94 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueHAFN-68%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD50.6/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY39.2GROWTH62.2VALUE53.3
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY93.8GROWTH43.1VALUE96.5
GXOHAFNQuality39.293.8Growth62.243.1Value53.396.5
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-3%18%2.5x49xGXOHAFN

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFGXO$180mHAFN$981m
RevGXO+7.6%HAFN+7.4%
D/EGXO2.02HAFN0.40
P/EGXO42.5xHAFN8.6x
GXO
stronger →← stronger
HAFN
39
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
94
62
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
43
53
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
96
HAFN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
GXO
HAFN
$180mC
FCF
$981mC+
+7.6%B
Rev
+7.4%B
2.02C
D/E
0.40B+
42.5xC
P/E
8.6xA
1.29B
PEG
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
GXO
HAFN
122% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
68% below
~32%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
-62%
1-yr DCF upside
+243%
-55%
5-yr DCF upside
+208%
-43%
10-yr DCF upside
+166%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
GXO
No notable signals flagged.
HAFN
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Short track record
GXOGXO Logistics, Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · $47.98 · beta 1.55
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $5.5b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $66.85 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $68.71 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 137% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.02 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.55 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 42x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
HAFNHafnia Limited
Marine Shipping · $7.77 · beta -0.15
Why now
Marine Shipping · market cap $3.9b. 19% off the 52-week high of $9.54.
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 34% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where GXO and HAFN diverge

On the headline score the gap is 21.4 points in favor of HAFN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.