COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
GT vs LKQ
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GT scored 39.9, LKQ scored 59.6 — LKQ leads.
Compare another set
GT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
39.9
$6.15 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.7
LKQ leads
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
59.6
$25.36 · $6.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthLKQ+1.3%
- Strongest balance sheetLKQ0.82
- Highest qualityLKQ65 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGT-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GT
stronger →← stronger
LKQ
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
93
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
LKQ is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GT
LKQ
$192mC
FCF
$625mC+
-4.3%D+
Rev
+1.3%C
2.74C
D/E
0.82B
0.1xA
P/S
—
0.43A
PEG
0.92B+
—
P/E
14.1xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GT
LKQ
57% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
54% below
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-9%/yr
+77%
1-yr DCF upside
+85%
+132%
5-yr DCF upside
+117%
+244%
10-yr DCF upside
+173%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GT
Why this score
- Durable high returns
LKQ
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
GTThe Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $1.8b. Down 42% from 52-week high of $10.62 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.43 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $7.46 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
D/E 2.74 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Currently unprofitable (margin -14.4%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 42% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
LKQLKQ Corporation
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $6.4b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $37.13 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.92 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $32.50 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 136% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GT and LKQ diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.7 points in favor of LKQ. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthGT 14.1 · LKQ 50.0LKQ +35.9
- ValueGT 92.8 · LKQ 65.4GT +27.4
- QualityGT 48.4 · LKQ 64.7LKQ +16.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.