COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
GT vs LEA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GT scored 39.9, LEA scored 62.3 — LEA leads.
Compare another set
GT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
39.9
$6.15 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
22.4
LEA leads
LEA
Lear Corporation
62.3
$124.42 · $8.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthLEA+3.5%
- Strongest balance sheetLEA0.66
- Highest qualityLEA62 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGT-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GT
stronger →← stronger
LEA
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
93
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
LEA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GT
LEA
$192mC
FCF
$849mC+
-4.3%D+
Rev
+3.5%C+
2.74C
D/E
0.66B+
0.1xA
P/S
—
0.43A
PEG
0.36A
—
P/E
11.5xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GT
LEA
57% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
35% below
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+77%
1-yr DCF upside
+36%
+132%
5-yr DCF upside
+55%
+244%
10-yr DCF upside
+86%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GT
Why this score
- Durable high returns
LEA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
The companies
GTThe Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $1.8b. Down 42% from 52-week high of $10.62 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.43 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $7.46 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
D/E 2.74 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Currently unprofitable (margin -14.4%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 42% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
LEALear Corporation
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $8.3b. 17% off the 52-week high of $150.33. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $150.50 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 2.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GT and LEA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 22.4 points in favor of LEA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthGT 14.1 · LEA 50.0LEA +35.9
- ValueGT 92.8 · LEA 77.4GT +15.4
- QualityGT 48.4 · LEA 62.3LEA +13.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.